TechnologyPhysics and the drive

The physics and the drive.

Why annihilation light is the fastest exhaust there is, how the SoLeV drive would make it and aim it, and the research that decides which design wins.

01/ The physics

Light is the fastest exhaust there is.

A rocket can't go much faster than its own exhaust before the fuel it needs grows exponentially. Chemical rockets throw exhaust out at about 4.4 km/s. Pushing a payload to 10 percent of light speed that way would take a launch-to-payload mass ratio that is a 2,948-digit number. The observable universe holds roughly 1080 atoms.

How much of the fuel's mass becomes energy

Log scale · fraction of rest mass

    Antimatter stores energy; it does not create it. Making a positron always costs more energy than its annihilation gives back, so a mission's antimatter has to be produced ahead of time, by a facility powered from outside the probe.

    E = mc²

    All of it becomes energy

    When an electron and its antimatter twin, the positron, meet at rest, they usually vanish into two gamma-ray photons of 511 keV each. A gram of antimatter meeting a gram of matter releases 1.8 × 1014 joules, about two days of output from a one-gigawatt power plant.

    p = E / c

    Light pushes

    Photons have no mass, but they carry momentum, so a beam of light pointed backward pushes the ship forward. The push is gentle: a gigawatt of perfectly aimed light gives 3.3 newtons, which is why the drive needs enormous power.

    β = tanh(η ln R)

    The relativistic rocket equation

    For a perfect drive (η = 1), reaching 0.2c takes a launch-to-dry mass ratio R of only 1.22: about 18 percent of the launch mass is fuel. η measures how well the drive aims its exhaust.

    Speed 0.20 c Doppler ahead ×1.22 Sky in forward half 60%
    Our cruise target
    Annihilation releases more than 250 times the energy of fusion, kilogram for kilogram. It is the densest fuel physics allows.

    Project Daedalus, the classic 1970s fusion starship study, called for a 54,000-tonne ship to fly past Barnard's Star at 12 percent of light speed. Annihilation turns every gram into light, so the challenge moves from how much fuel to how to make it, hold it, and point it. That is the work SoLeV is organized around.

    02/ The drive

    An engine that runs on light.

    The SoLeV drive aims its fuel, not its light. It would accelerate electrons and positrons, merge them into one beam pointed aft and let them annihilate behind the probe, so their light is born moving backward. It grew out of a 2017 undergraduate research paper at Auburn University and is organized around six subsystems, from antimatter supply to the probe it carries.

    Concept schematic of the SoLeV probe. From the nose back: payload, truss, radiators, antimatter supply, shadow shield and power core. Behind them, two accelerators drive electrons and positrons into a merger magnet that joins them into one beam pointed aft, and the pairs annihilate behind the probe into gamma rays already beamed backward. DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ≈1/γ e⁺e⁻ → γ, beamed aft 05 04 e⁻ e⁺ 03 02 01 06
    Fig. 03 · SoLeV probe · concept, not to scale01 · Antimatter supply

    1. 01 Antimatter supply

      Make the antimatter, then hold it.

      Positrons are the antimatter twins of electrons. Fire an ultra-intense laser pulse into a millimeter-thick gold target and part of its energy becomes electron-positron pairs. Labs make billions per shot this way.

      Making antimatter always costs more energy than it returns, so the probe would launch with a reserve produced in advance, at a scale no facility reaches yet. Holding grams of it for decades is still an open problem, and one of the largest on the path to launch.

      Positrons per laser shot, lab
      1010 to 1012
      Laser intensity
      > 1018 W/cm²
      Antimatter, 100 kg probe, 0.2c and braking into orbit, ideal drive
      25 kg

    2. 02 Power core

      Burn part of the fuel for electricity.

      The accelerators need power, and the only source on board is the antimatter itself. A share of the pairs would annihilate inside a tungsten-lined core that stops their gamma rays as heat, and a converter would turn the heat into electricity.

      Heat that can't be converted leaves through large radiators. Facing aft, they would add thrust of their own, and the design needs that push to beat a plain white-hot absorber.

      Fuel burned for power, 50% conversion
      67 to 91%
      Radiated at 3,000 K, one side
      4.6 MW/m²
      Flat thermal emitter η
      2/3

    3. 03 Accelerators

      Push the pairs out the back.

      Two linear accelerators, one for electrons and one for positrons, would drive both beams to the same speed. This is where the thrust is made: every particle pushed aft pushes the probe forward, before anything annihilates.

      Faster pairs make tighter light but cost more energy, so there is a best speed. At 50 percent conversion it is 87 to 98 percent of light speed, depending on whether the radiators push too.

      Best pair speed, 50% conversion
      0.87 to 0.98 c
      Effective exhaust speed, same
      0.58 to 0.84 c
      Where the push happens
      Accelerators

    4. 04 Merger Core research

      Aim the pairs before they meet.

      Magnets bend electrons and positrons in opposite directions. Fed in from opposite sides, the two beams would cross a single dipole magnet and leave it as one: side by side, at the same speed, pointed straight back. A solenoid would keep them squeezed together.

      The angle between the beams decides where the light goes. Beams that collide head-on make light that sprays in every direction. Beams that travel together make light that leaves with them.

      Ideal angle between the beams
      0°, parallel
      Bending radius, 0.87c pair, 1 T
      3.0 mm
      Aft momentum, beams at ±α
      β cos α

    5. 05 Annihilation in flight

      The exhaust is aimed before it turns to light.

      The merged beam leaves as a neutral stream of electrons and positrons. When a pair meets and vanishes into gamma rays, the light carries exactly the pair's momentum, so it keeps going aft. Seen from the pairs it leaves in every direction, but the pairs are moving at most of light speed, so the probe sees it swept along their path.

      The faster the pairs, the tighter the light: half of it leaves within 30° of straight back at 0.87c, and within 10° at 0.985c. A dilute beam may spread out before most pairs annihilate. That changes nothing for the probe, because the push already happened at the accelerators.

      Half the photons within, 0.87c
      30°
      Half the photons within, 0.985c
      9.9°
      Photons heading forward, 0.87c
      6.7%

    6. 06 The probe

      Shielded, armored, autonomous.

      A dense shadow shield would protect everything forward of the engine, with a long truss adding distance. At the nose, a layered shield would take interstellar dust impacts, and a laser telescope would send data across 4.34 light-years.

      1 µg dust grain at 0.2c
      0.44 kg TNT
      Interstellar gas
      0.1–0.2 atoms/cm³
      Signal delay home
      4.34 yr

    02.1/ Why aim the pairs

    Aim the antimatter, not the light.

    Once a gamma ray exists, almost nothing can turn it around. We compared four ways to send annihilation light aft. Each will be simulated and published with its assumptions, and the pair beam leads on the physics so far.

    A · Pair beam Baseline

    Steer the antimatter, not the light.

    Aim electrons and positrons aft before they meet, and their light is born moving aft. This is the drive described above.

    Why it's promising
    No gamma mirror needed. Steering charged particles is mature accelerator physics, and laser-made pair beams are already fast and narrow.
    The hard part
    Accelerating the pairs takes power, so most of the antimatter would be burned to make electricity, and no one has yet turned annihilation energy into beam power efficiently. At 50 percent conversion, with radiators shining aft, the effective exhaust speed would be about 84 percent of light speed. Without the radiators' push it falls to 58 percent, below a plain white-hot absorber.
    B · Electron-beam nozzle · 2017 concept

    Scatter the light off electrons.

    Annihilate the pairs at rest, then cross the light with relativistic electron beams that Compton-scatter it aft. This was the founding idea of the 2017 paper.

    Why it's promising
    Compton scattering is well understood, and labs already use it to make tunable gamma-ray beams.
    The hard part
    Gamma rays rarely interact. Scattering most of them needs an electron column as dense as solid matter, far beyond any beam.
    C · Absorb and re-radiate

    Turn gamma rays into heat, then into thrust.

    A tungsten absorber would stop the gamma rays and conduct the heat to a white-hot emitter that radiates mostly aft.

    Why it's promising
    Known physics and materials, testable in small steps. A credible drive for precursor missions.
    The hard part
    Radiating enough power per kilogram for interstellar speeds. A flat emitter's directional efficiency is about 2/3; reflectors could raise it, at a cost in size and mass.
    D · Gamma-ray laser · long shot

    Make the light coherent at birth.

    A cold, dense condensate of positronium could annihilate by stimulated emission, releasing 511 keV photons along a single axis.

    Why it's promising
    It is the only known way to aim annihilation light as it is created without first accelerating the pairs.
    The hard part
    No positronium condensate exists yet. It needs extreme density at a few kelvin, reached within the atom's 142-nanosecond lifetime. The light leaves both ways along the axis, so the forward half must be absorbed or re-radiated aft.

    Read the technical notes

    Join/ The mission

    Help us get there in our lifetime.

    We are gathering physicists, engineers, and backers who want to see another star system up close. Get mission updates, or tell us how you'd like to help.

    We'll email you when there is real progress to report. Nothing else, and you can leave any time.